The appearance of fake porn created by artificial intelligence was perhaps inevitable. A small community on reddit has created and configured a desktop app that uses machine learning to transform non-sex photos and seamlessly convert videos to sex files. Machine learning to graft the face onto still porn frames and tie the entire clip together. Today, most of the creations are short videos with famous female actresses. The application was first reported by motherboard. This technology has been in use on reddit since the end of last year, but a desktop application that allows anyone to organize their own rigged sex videos has only been developed here for a full week. In the year the recommendation was written, the subreddit had 29,000 subscribers. “If we talk about technological developments, this is not surprising,” says claire mcglynn, a professor at durham law school who specializes in pornography rules and images of sexual violence . “Due to the availability of this technology, there is probably many times more going on than we know.” The fakesapp software is currently hosted on google drive. A separate download mirror has also been uploaded to the mega. The person behind the google drive account responded to the initial request for an interview, but did not answer the main question at the posting stage. Google has also not responded to inquiries about whether hosting the program on its servers violates its clauses. While it appears no non-celebrity videos have yet been created, there are countless examples of sexual images being created. Without consent by processing static images. “If the players don't know it's photoshopped, they'll assume the artwork is your image,” says mcglynn. “Violence can be the same, harassment can be the same, a negative impact on your family and employer. I don't think there's any reason to rant that there's less harm because it's photoshop." Fake porn files created by artificial intelligence will only exacerbate this problem. Earlier the other day, https://www.News.Com.Au/national/queensland/courts-law/man-pleads - guilty of photoshopping-his-stepdaughter-face-on-rollers/news-story/66c5ed730322b0d805124e1e7472e01e?From=rss-basic an australian was sentenced to 12 months in prison when he photoshopped images of his stepdaughter onto images of women engaging in sex acts and bestiality. The man called them works of art. A resident of north jersey also spoke about how potential employers found fake images of her nude on the internet. The photos were originally taken from her myspace profile and the man accused of taking them will stand trial. The incident only came to light after he was arrested for invading another woman's privacy. In a long list of examples, indian actress jyoti krishna also revealed that her photo was used in fake news. Pornographic image. Three years ago, two teenagers in india were arrested for making fake videos with the involvement of other actresses. In the uk, the law on fake images and porn videos is very vague. There is no specific offense that governs the creation of fake images without permission. But max campbell, defamation, privacy and harassment attorney for brett wilson llp, testifies that users who create such videos can face a number of criminal and civil charges. "This can be equated to harassment or malicious communication," he explains. Rights to yet another use of photographs or videos that were not created by a person.A british urban worker was facing a court on charges of harassment after he was accused of editing a woman's face in pornographic images, and in the end posted the package on the internet. Revenge video law came into force in the uk three years ago. Films are mentioned here, although it is not specified if fake images are being distributed. In scotland, the law states that charges can be brought if the film or video is "altered". A security hole in the chatgpt and bing canvas By matt burgess The 15 best shows on apple tv right now Angela watercutter 41 best movies on netflix this week Matt kamen Why suicide rates are decreasing worldwide Grace brown “All these technologies are being created and you all have to deal with this , so now is the time to talk about your ethical standards,” says mcglynn. “What we have to think about before some people use these apps and one of them should be about the impact on the victim. This should be reflected in the legislation.” Creating these fake videos is not technically difficult . The tutorial explains how the circuit works and what equipment is needed - with most of the steps performed automatically.Two types of content are needed to create a video: source frames where a person wishes to have a head transplant, and a database of photos or videos head part of a person, which they are eager to transplant in rollers. The machine learning algorithm is then trained to shape and position the face. When such a paragraph is completed, it can be added to individual frames of the video. The deepfakes subreddit itself is mixed with fake videos of public people and a person with questions about ai. A single conversation is vague about existing image databases to be used in machine learning, about ai porn generators - ai-porno.net - and another about modest gpu requirements. Above, there is a thread titled: “when to give blowjobs?” These days, fakeapp is mainly used to add celebrity faces to existing porn videos. But the way the ai scheme works means that it can be done to add any face to any video. Just as images of non-consensual sexual violence are now often colloquially referred to as "revenge porn", this ai system can be easily used to create fake pornographic videos in the form of a harassment tool. a separate tool created by a pornographic website is also allowed to be used to match the faces of pals or celebrities to porn stars, adding another tool to an ever-growing arsenal. Megacams, the firm behind the face-matching tool, told the memo: "the question of whether it's ethical or bad depends on who uses it." One of the extremely common questions on the deepfakes subreddit assure that this practice is not required bad. Reddit user gravity_horse writes, "what we're doing here is not considered helpful or noble, it's humiliating, vulgar and blinding to women wearing deepfakes." Ignoring this, the user assures that this was not done with "malicious intent".